Categories
Archives
- March 2010 (1)
- January 2009 (1)
- November 2008 (4)
- October 2008 (4)
- September 2008 (1)
- August 2008 (4)
- July 2008 (4)
- June 2008 (1)
- May 2008 (1)
- April 2008 (2)
- February 2008 (2)
- January 2008 (4)
- December 2007 (1)
- September 2007 (1)
- July 2007 (4)
- June 2007 (7)
- May 2007 (5)
- April 2007 (2)
- March 2007 (1)
- January 2007 (1)
- August 2006 (5)
Tags
- accident aging amanda animals art backup bald benchmark birds bizarre blood cake caligola car clothes debian dell dof dog bite dogs filesystems fotozondagavond garden hair holiday house injury insects italy leak linux luxury metal multimedia music nature nvidia perl pets presidents privacy programming pusa running sofia sound source spelling spiders sports spring surgery suspend sysadmin test thailand unix vampires vijntje water xml youth sentiment
Links
And the nominees are...
September 13th, 2007
The nominations for the Dutch Big Brother Awards are in (see the Big Brother Awards website).

The Big Brother Awards are awarded to institutions, companies and individuals who promote privacy violations and it is much needed. There’s no equivalent of the ACLU in the Netherlands. We used to have a foundation called Bits of Freedom, but it sadly demised due to lack of funding and, apparently, interest. This is quite serious. In a time when our government not only fails to safeguard our privacy against outside intrusions, but also actively plans to intrude more into our personal lives, it is of vital importance to have an interest in civil liberties and rights. It seems, however, that we’ve been lulled to sleep over the years.
It’s a sad sign (or reflection of the general attitude) that most political parties do not seem to care about protecting the privacy of their voters. Those that do have an opinion, often have the wrong one, parroting the old, “if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.”
Using the threat of terrorism and fighting crime as arguments, the government promotes the collection of more data about individuals and allowing easier access for various agencies. All that is combined with the fallacious belief in an infallible government, i.e.: only authorised people will ever have access to sensitive data and these people will never abuse our trust. Perhaps not surprisingly, it’s the religious parties that have the least problems in believing this. After all, they already believe in an infallible higher power…
Linkage:
- Big Brother Awards website (English version)
- Bits of Freedom
- Privacy International
- Dutch Identity Campaign (BTW, the law passed :-()
